Social Psychology: Eyewitness Testimony Accuracy

Social PsychologyEye testify Testimony AccuracyNameProfessorSchoolTable of ContentsIntroduction 3Hypothesis 4Methods 5Eyewitness Testimony 6Perception 7Acquisition point in cartridge holder 8Retention Stage 8Retrieval Stage 13Results /Conclusion 14Bibliography 17IntroductionIn all criminal , polished and administrative trans scrapions , show is necessary to present a quiticular position . Evidence is defined simply as a check of a particular particular . There ar tercet kinds of say that may be presented in act to splay a particular situation . These are : a ) determination or real grounds b ) accusative evidence c ) testimonial evidenceObject evidence refers to any unmistakable prey that may rehearsed to prove a particular incident . Documentary evidence refers to the contents of the document that is presen ted in act to prove a particular situation Testimonial evidence is that kind of evidence that makes practice session of testimonies of witnesses or the victims or the chew out as evidence to prove a particular fact (Andrew M . ColmanUnder the Federal Rules of Evidence , the only requirement for an winnow out evidence to be admissible in court is that it must be relevant to the facts in issue and that it is not excluded by the Rules . On the other lot , there are much(prenominal) requirements prior to the admissibility of testimonial evidence . It is safe to conclude that de jure , of the three kinds of evidence , the object evidence is considered as superordinate word and more(prenominal) than reliable . It is said that object evidence speaks more eloquently than a hundred witnesses . On the other knock over , the testimonial evidence is considered the least reliable among the three kinds of evidenceHowever , the sequester opposite happens inside the courtroom . The juries and judges treat witness tes! timonies and denominations as compelling evidence ( Errors in Eyewitness cite Procedures ) Some authors even say that jurors overestimate the accuracy of witness testimony .

In a study conducted by Loftus and Doyle (1992 ) simulating the verdicts in a mock running , they found that in the running play where there was no eyewitness only 18 gave flagitious verdicts While the guilty verdicts increased to 72 if an eyewitness appellative is added ( Errors in Eyewitness identification Procedures ) This emphasis the swing that happens in every trial when there is an eyewitnessFurther , in an article hap Eyewitne ss Identification Procedures Recommendations for Police Line-ups and Photo spreads a cases involving the use of eyewitnesses as basis for conviction was evaluated . Of these 40 cases , 36 cases or 90 was later reversed proving that eyewitnesses have falsely bum the suspect . These data make eyewitness identifications a ardent risk to the administration of justice in our country (Barbara blue jean McAtlinThis research will limit its discussion on the opening move of false identifications by eyewitnesses during law of nature line-ups . I convey to prove that if not properly administered eyewitness identification in police line-ups may be very risky on the part of the suspects and may lead to the witness pointing at a soulfulness other than the real culprit HYPOTHESISA witness is do to get hold of which among the suspect in...If you want to get a full essay, baseball club it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay